Obama and the media: It’s not a sing-along

Bob Franken
There’s a song by the blues ensemble “Fathead” with a terrific title: “First Class Riff-Raff”. I would call it to the attention of all our big-headed politicians who get so caught up in their delusions of grandeur they don’t remember how Americans see them: As First Class Riff Raff.

Riff-raff.
It’s easy for them to forget that the their esteem and the terrific honorifics are merely the reflected glory of their offices. We chose them after they probably went through demeaning gyrations in order to be elevated onto their government pedestals. So it’s easy to understand why we take great delight in knocking them off.
That brings to mind another piece of music: “Send in the Clowns”. Let’s face it, the news biz is saturated with ill-informed bombast and triviality that masquerades as journalism. It’s not entirely that way, but oftentimes, the substance is drowned out by the noise and blotted out by superficiality. This abandonment of the mission to inform has been accelerated by the desperate efforts to keep up with the Internet.
So it’s easy to understand why a political leader, say a president of the United States, might get a little thin-skinned after awhile, weary of trying to match wits with nitwits. All this static interferes with his message.
There’s only one thing worse, President Obama (did I mention this was about President Obama?). What’s worse are docile, pliant media who, instead of tripping you up, march in lockstep with you, as so many did during the campaign. It wasn’t good for the country then and it isn’t now. Clowns we may be, but you are not the Ringmaster.
Like so many in power, any and all presidents, eventually look out from their circle of sycophants and see a herd that engages in rabble-rousing instead of reporting that would properly explain the nuance of thinking among you and yours. It’s easy to see how a generation or two ago, the press was viewed as a collection of “Ink Stained Wretches”. All that’s changed in modern times is that most people wonder what “ink” is. But then, as now, you leaders of the free world decide that doesn’t include a free press. Inevitably, you go that extra step…you get spiteful.
The anti-media rhetoric becomes a standard part of your speech. You resort to attempts at intimidation, in ways that not only display pettiness but counterproductive silliness. As an example, look at how the paltry efforts to shut out Fox News have not only sent even more wingnuts to FNC, but have even forced the competitors to galvanize in support of the the network and the principle that it’s not up to you to determine which organizations are acceptable.
Preach to your choirs all you want, politicians, but try to remember we in the media are not part of them. We can be expected to carry a different tune, and no matter how discordant it may seem to you it is not your right to force us into adhering to what you consider proper harmony.
No one will take on Obama, and the Washington establishment, like Newt Gingrich
Fantastic: Obama would like to replicate Detroit’s foibles elsewhere
New York Times scandalized as NYPD is trained on Muslim-perpetrated violence
Detroit boldly choosing to crackdown on the innocent
South Carolina stopped Romney. For now
Cartoon: Down and out
In which I praise Mitt (but explain why I won’t vote for him)
Bernero the gambler sells Main Street for a shot at the slots
The Emergency Financial Manager law is undemocratic, but opponents need an alternative to guard against local fiscal calamities
Memo to Snyder: Don’t stop the radical reforms now!
interesting post, pretty much covered it all for me, thanks.
Thank you for this blog. Thats all I can say. You most undoubtedly have made this weblog into some thing thats eye opening and essential. You clearly know so considerably about the subject, youve covered so numerous bases. Excellent stuff from this part of the net. Once again, thank you for this weblog.
Thank you, I’ve recently been looking for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?