House Dems health bill introduces ‘temporary government program’
Dan Calabrese
Let’s see. When was the last time a “temporary government program” actually expired?
There wasn’t much news in the actual substance of the House Democrats’ health care bill as unveiled today. The whole announcement was mainly just Nancy Pelosi and crew patting themselves on the back and trying to create the impression that the bill’s enactment is a fait accompli.

It lives forever.
But they did give us something new, and anyone who’s concerned about what this health care gambit could become should be concerned about it. The bill doesn’t take full effect until 2013, at which point insurers would be barred from denying coverage to anyone because of pre-existing conditions.
We’ve debated the merits of that idea before, but what was new today was the announcement that a “temporary government program” will be created to insure all such people until the reforms are fully in force.
So if you’re unable to buy health insurance because you have a pre-existing condition, a “temporary” government program will cover you, and then . . . and then?
Presumably, in 2013, all these people will exit the government health care rolls and buy their own private insurance, now that the insurers have no choice but to sell it to them.
In 2013, we will either be starting President Obama’s second term or we will have a new Republican president. In the latter scenario, do you really envision President Palin, Romney, Huckabee or Cheney (I love doing that) going ahead and forcing all these health insurers to issue a bunch of new policies without any regard to the risk they’re incurring?
In the former scenario, do you really envision Obama being in such a hurry to dismantle a government program that is closest thing he’s been able to get so far to single-payer? Or would the opposite be more likely – that once the “temporary” program is in place, the administration informs us how well it is working, and how many more people are clamoring to be covered by it, in which case it might as well simply be expanded to cover, oh, say, everyone!
After all, in those “insurance exchanges” where private plans compete with the government plan for people’s business, the government plan always seems to win the competition, which might have a little something to do with the fact that the government can print money to subsidize its costs as well as its cut-rate premiums, and can impose mandates on its competitors.
Turns out the “public option” takes many rhetorical forms. Sometimes it’s just one more competitor in a broad field of insurance options (except that it happens to be the competitor who makes the rules). Other times it’s a “temporary government program,” except that this is about the biggest oxymoron anyone has ever spewed.
The bottom line on the Democrats’ plan is this: When you let government into the health insurance game, government controls the game, government wins the game.
Game over.
Become Dan’s friend on Facebook.
Become a fan of The North Star National on Facebook.
To book Dan as a speaker, contact Lourdes Swarts at Speakers Access.
No one will take on Obama, and the Washington establishment, like Newt Gingrich
Fantastic: Obama would like to replicate Detroit’s foibles elsewhere
New York Times scandalized as NYPD is trained on Muslim-perpetrated violence
Detroit boldly choosing to crackdown on the innocent
South Carolina stopped Romney. For now
Cartoon: Down and out
In which I praise Mitt (but explain why I won’t vote for him)
Bernero the gambler sells Main Street for a shot at the slots
The Emergency Financial Manager law is undemocratic, but opponents need an alternative to guard against local fiscal calamities
Memo to Snyder: Don’t stop the radical reforms now!
[...] National’s Dan Calabrese was watching Queen Nancy’s performance this week, when she trotted out the new and improved 1990 page House version of Obamacare and acted like it was the ULTIMATE bill that would solve all of the world’s problems [...]
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …
Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!鈥?
Nearly all of the things you articulate happens to be supprisingly precise and that makes me wonder why I hadn’t looked at this with this light previously. This article truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this particular issue goes. However there is actually one particular point I am not necessarily too comfortable with and while I make an effort to reconcile that with the actual main idea of your issue, permit me see just what the rest of your readers have to say.Nicely done.
Online tyres shop in internet.