Comments on: House Democrats’ health bill: Huge costs and taxes, more economic irrationality and delusion (and all John Boehner can do is count the pages)

By: Zenaida Rosca

Zenaida Rosca — Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:09:02 +0000

What can be your up coming niche monday on the blog..,,

By: Saga Car Insurance

Saga Car Insurance — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:44:36 +0000

I feel a lot more men and women should read blogs like this. Its so crucial to know the best way to construct an excellent weblog to get individuals interested and youve carried out just that. The content is great, the videos are best for what youre trying to say. Awesome, man. Actually awesome! Cant wait to read more.

By: The Weekly Claw 11-3-09 - AllMilitary.com's Military Blog

The Weekly Claw 11-3-09 - AllMilitary.com's Military Blog — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:23:59 +0000

[...] Star National’s Dan Calabrese is wondering why House Minority Leader Boehner is only complaining about the size of the P-Lousy Obamacare bill, when there’s sooooo much on the inside worth attacking. I guess [...]

By: Dan Calabrese

Dan Calabrese — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:55:21 +0000

Me running for office? Yikes. Thank you for the compliment, but no. I actually tried it once, a very long time ago. Definitely not for me. I’ll stick with this if that’s OK with everyone.

By: Lance M Hillier Sr

Lance M Hillier Sr — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:16:36 +0000

( Justices=9 Justices

p.s. Good job proofreading Dan… great post.

By: Lance M Hillier Sr

Lance M Hillier Sr — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:14:52 +0000

And, not my Representative or my two Texas Senators, including a former Justice of the Texas Supreme Court (Cornyn) has addressed the Constitutional issue of what Congress is doing meddling in private health care in the first place. The closest I got was a comment from one of the Senators that this is a ‘perfect case’ for the US Supreme Court to address. Say what? Whether the Senate or the House Bill gets passed, an amalgamation of both is guaranteed to be over 1,500 pages. The Supreme Court has never, in its 200-plus year history ever addressed an entire body of law, only a narrow focus, one at a time. So our Congress would stick us with a plan not one Representative or Senator will submit themselves to, and we the People can then try to find a lawyer to argue one aspect of the law before ( Justices true? Are we, or they, on drugs? And who wants to share?

By: gices

gices — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:45:11 +0000

You’ve shown some really good points here. As you have said, the plan needs to benefit the whole nation and not just a minority.

By: AntonioSosa

AntonioSosa — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:37:03 +0000

I have to agree with you, Dan Calabrese. They are not really “defending us.” We need people who are really able to represent us and defend us. How about you running for office?

By: Dan Calabrese

Dan Calabrese — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:38:28 +0000

They’re not “defending us.” They’re mumbling inanities about page counts. If they happen upon this column and would like to use it in formulating a better argument than the ones they’re using, I believe the nation would benefit.

By: AntonioSosa

AntonioSosa — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:35:16 +0000

Great arguments, Dan Calabrese! They are well expressed and they all make sense. I hope you get those arguments to the people defending us from the monstrous Obamacare scam.