So she wrote a book. That means we have to have full Palinpalooza?

Jamie Weinstein
Sarah Palin is all over the news again.
Why?
Purportedly because she wrote a book.
That’s right. Sarah Palin wrote a book. She appeared on Oprah. Barbara Walters interviewed her. Whoopee! Call in the news brigade.

So?
As far as I can tell, there is nothing earth shattering in her book. I can’t say that from my own research because I haven’t read the book (and probably won’t). But I suspect if there was something supremely newsworthy in the book it would have been mentioned by now during the wall-to-wall Sarah Palin coverage on the cable news networks. At least one of the 11 AP fact checkers would have brought it to light, right?
If you want to learn a little bit more about Palin’s life, you probably could do worse than reading her book. I’m sure a lot of people will like it. After all, a lot of people can connect with Palin. An ambitious moose hunter who works hard to achieve great success in Alaskan politics only to wake up one day to be asked to run for the vice-presidency of the United States. A working mom simultaneously raising five children, one of which becomes pregnant as a teenager, after which the child’s father decides to become a porn star. Hers is the prototypical American family. Well, maybe not prototypical. Or even close to prototypical. But, hey, if you are Jon and Kate, you probably can relate to the Palin eight.
All jests aside, the book is apparently filled with snippets of Palin’s life, policy views, and some score-settling with her campaign handlers. Some of her accounts are disputed while a few claims have been disproven. This sounds a lot like just about every political book ever written by a politician—or should I say ever ghostwritten for a politician. The content of her book certainly doesn’t explain the current Palin frenzy on TV.
The reason, of course, there is this frenzy over Palin’s book is because its debut provides an opportunity for talking heads to pontificate on a woman who is unquestionably one of the most polarizing figures in American politics. Those who love her really love her and can see no wrong in their Alaskan Annie Oakley. And those who hate her really hate her and insanely envision Sarah Palin as America’s Mullah Omar. With this type of passion on both sides, anything Palin does creates a firestorm. Even her Facebook posts inspire heated debate.
While Palin has played coy about her possible presidential ambition for 2012 in interviews, the fact of the matter is that she gave up that option over the summer when she resigned as governor of Alaska. You can’t just resign as governor without any good reason in the first two years of your first term and expect to be a serious presidential contender. If Palin decides to run in 2012, she will most certainly come up short of the Republican nomination, even if she shows well in several primary contests due to her contingent of diehard supporters. I dare say that even her more vocal supporters on television would be reticent to vote for her. For many of them, their passionate support for her seems to be driven, at least in part, by much of the liberal media’s passionate distaste for her.
That said, one cannot legitimately argue that Palin is not politically talented. She was engaging on Oprah, even if sometimes stupefying. (How could she think that her D in a college course decades ago was a more significant skeleton in the closet than her daughter’s out-of-wedlock teen pregnancy? As Palin might say, that’s just “bull crap.”) I can also see how a Palin hater might find her personality grating—though I can’t understand some of the more venomous attacks on her. Let’s just say Palin inspires different things in different people.
But can we please tone down the Palinmania coverage just a bit? She wrote a book, a book that doesn’t seem to be particularly groundbreaking.
There are a lot more important issues going on right now that deserve more coverage than Palinpalooza.

The term “good reasons”, of course, is subjective. Many Americans believe that she did have good, rational, reasons for resigning. And she laid those reasons out rather clearly in her resignation speech. They boiled down to: circumstances outside her control had made it impossible to give the job all she should.
However, if we look at Obama we see that he deserted his job in the Senate to start campaigning almost as soon as elected. Yet he and his supporters seemed to think that the honorable thing for him to do was to continue milking the taxpayers for wages and compensation after circumstance under his control had made it impossible to give the job all he should.
This is how Palin supporters see it. And when you Palin haters slam her for resigning you sound completely nuts to us.
Fascinating point by Fred. Palin couldn’t give the job “all she should” due to “circumstances outside her control” so she quit and wrote a book for money. This is a great lesson for the leaders of our time and the leaders of the future. When criticism is mounting, ethical complaints and charges are looming, and unsophisticated people are telling you you’re the height of excellence, the first thing you should do is abandon the responsibilities you’ve promised your people, give vague explanations, and write a book. (oh, and the Obama comparison, though I’m not a fan, is just absurd). Great article, Mr. Weinstein.
[...] that loves to deride her has spent the past few days obsessing over her — so much so that Jamie Weinstein wonders whether the media knows that there are other stories to cover. We didn’t see anything like [...]
Todd, you do know, don’t you, that your reply is just Palin-hater spin, a hater’s twisted opinion? However, in contrast, I posted the indisputable facts as they are.
Todd,
Get used to it tadd pole, she is preparing to do GREAT things for OUR country!!! let’s face if OBAMA is a one termer kind of a jimmy Carter rerun….
> That means we have to have full Palinpalooza?
You betcha.
She quit because it was the only way she could get Andrew Sullivan out of here uterus. Why do we love her? Because she’s a NORMAL person. She’s not some ego-inflated, pseudointellectual dipwad who can’t think logically and learn the lessons of history. You know, complicated concepts like socialism doesn’t work, you can’t borrow your way out of debt and you can’t spend your way to prosperity. (My dumba** Senator Bob Casey believes you can.) It takes an Ivy League education to bankrupt the richest nation in history in only a few short years. And yeah, I include Bush in that.
Ths AP has eleven reporters available to fact check Palin’s book but not one to fact check their own ’so called news’ stories which are wrong 75-80% of the time. Anyone still wondering why the fringe media is going down the tube? She resigned at governor to get all of President O’Dumbo’s **ck lickers out of Alaska. GWB may have been a big spender but O’Dumbo’s Oct deficit was larger than GWB;s for the entire year of 2007. Pray for O’Dumbo: Psalm 109:8 Check it out.
One thing about this woman, she definitely hits buttons for some folks. Too bad they can’t figure out why they hate her so much. In fact, I’m not sure they even really know.
There’s something about her that goes up people’s spines. But that’s the way most of the comments here are for me. You don’t like her. We get it.
For once, however, it would be nice if you could make some actual arguments for WHY you don’t like her instead of just blathering on the same talking points that have been around for a year.
I suspect if you would take a few minutes and actually listen to the woman speak in her own words, give the book a read WITHOUT your preconceived ideas clouding your vision and using just a smidge of objectivity, you might find that while you STILL don’t like her, you can tolerate her.
Many moderates who hate Palin are the same folks who insisted those of us more conservative republicans should stop letting our reservations about McCain color our views on who should represent the party. We did. And look what we got. The most liberal, destructive president in history.
Thanks. I think history might just prove you Palin haters are the ones incorrect on this issue. Instead of using common sense you’re allowing whatever visceral hatred you have for this woman color your views. Basically, you’re doing EXACTLY what you accused us of doing last year.
For DocinPA:
It’s true that socialism does not work. It’s also true that we should heed history.
You know what else doesn’t work? Nation-building. It’s been an overwhelming failure in most of the world, and a TOTAL failure in the Arab world. It’s never, ever worked in an Arab country.
This is one conservative (not neo-con, but conservative) who really wishes the U.S. would stop squandering our blood treasure, as well as digging ourselves further into debt with Red China, and heed history where that particular issues is concerned.
For Mad Monica:
This author does an excellent job of explaining why many people (including conservatives like myself), do not hold Sarah Palin in high regard. And there’s no “hatred” expressed here… just reason.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped1119chapmannov19,0,4222240.column